Categories
Real-estate markets most likely to rebound
It's tough all over, but some say these 5 cities have the best chances for speedy recoveries.
By Dorothy Pomerantz, ForbesIf you're a homeowner seeing property values plummet, look to the commercial real-estate market for solace. It might tell you which areas will recover fastest — and which will likely remain weak.
The Urban Land Institute recently asked 700 real-estate professionals to name the best (and worst) places to invest in commercial real estate in the coming year. Those surveyed included private developers, real-estate agents and real-estate investment trust executives. Their answers also apply to the residential market, since the single-family-home sector typically follows the economy. As wages go up and there are more jobs, more people can buy homes, pushing prices up.
The best cities in which to invest are those that are considered gateways to international investment, have vital downtowns where people can forgo cars and don't have a glut of condos or office space.
These traits landed Seattle the No. 1 spot on the list. No city scored above a 6.15 on a scale of one to nine (one being an abysmal place to invest and nine being excellent).
Seattle is "a diversified market, has a good base of business and is becoming a 24-hour city," says Stephen Blank, senior resident fellow, finance, at the Urban Land Institute. "It's going to be in a good position to come back."
The city is suffering from the loss of Washington Mutual and the downsizing of Starbucks, but Boeing and Microsoft are still strong. Apartment vacancies are low and there aren't too many new buildings going up, meaning the market won't be oversupplied. The same is true of retail space.
San Francisco comes in second, with a 6.12. The “City by the Bay” learned from the 2001 tech crash not to overbuild. There is a reasonable supply of office and apartment space, which should limit vacancies. San Francisco's port is also expected to help the city during the downturn as Americans continue to rely on Asian imports.
Washington, D.C., New York and Los Angeles round out the top five.
Of course, there's no guarantee that an improved commercial market will lead to an improved home market. However, investors have a better chance of seeing home prices rise in fundamentally strong markets like Seattle than in struggling cities like Detroit.
It landed at the bottom of the list, scoring a 2.24. Detroit has been reliant on the car industry, which is rapidly shrinking. Other businesses are unlikely to fill the void in the next few years, which means the city will be hit hard by further economic struggles.
New Orleans also lands near the bottom with a score of 3.33. The city has been losing businesses to Houston, Dallas and Atlanta since Hurricane Katrina hit in 2005.
The other cities at the bottom of the list — Columbus, Ohio; Milwaukee, Wis.; and Cleveland — suffer from dying industries and lack of tourist appeal.
Recent attempts to turn downtown Milwaukee into a thriving 24-hour city haven't been enough to protect it from the coming downturn. Increasingly picky investors are expected to favor higher-quality port cities over Midwest towns.
And while Columbus has the potential to become a major shipping hub for goods traveling cross-country, that revitalization may have to wait for a stronger economy and a government focused on improving the nation's roads. For now, prospects are dim.
Top 5 cities most likely to rebound
1. Seattle
4. New York
5. Los Angeles
The Real Estate Sky is NOT Falling!!!
How about some good news instead of the self-fulfilling prophecy of doom-n-gloom the media likes to spread. We live in the Great Pacific Northwest!! It is a great time to buy and own!! And if you want to sell, our home values are still holding strong!! There are one million more people expected to move into Washington State by 2010!! If your eyes have been open while driving through Renton, Bellevue, Tukwila, Kent, Seattle, Kirkland, Bothell etc., you have seen new construction including new shopping centers, new skyscrapers, new office buildings and not to mention the widening of roads and freeways. Do the Paul Allens and other developers and investors know something the media does not? Our real estate market is still appreciating and these people seem to be preparing for more growth. Are you? I think this article puts things in a fair perspective:
America's Undervalued Real Estate Markets
These cities are:
Charlotte, N.C. Forbes says this is one of the cheapest markets in the country on a per-square-foot basis. Financial services jobs are expanding rapidly and non-financial job growth isn’t heavily tied to housing production. A typical four-bedroom, two-and-a-half-bath home on a quarter of an acre is selling for about $550,000.
San Francisco. The technology and biotech sectors of the economy in the Bay Area continue to grow and there is no build up of housing inventory here. A typical four- bedroom, two-bath home sells for about $800,000.
Seattle. Seattle missed the condo boom because multi-family residential construction was slow in Seattle in 2002 and 2003. Now, Seattle condo real estate values are climbing at the fastest pace of any condo market in the country, according to Radar Logic, a real estate research firm. An attractive two-bedroom, two-bath, downtown condo property with panoramic views of city and Elliott Bay is selling for about $1 million.
Boston. The housing market in the trendy Back Bay has slowed, while Boston’s downtown and waterfront areas are attracting buyers interested in living near its booming tech businesses. A one-bedroom, one-bath condo with a view of Boston Harbor sells for less than $650,000.
New York City. The best place to buy in the nation’s most developed and densest real estate market is in the Financial District where the market is being flooded with residential housing and the neighborhood is transforming from a 9 to 5 area to a 24-hour residential area. A condo in a pre-World War I building with two bedrooms and one bath in the Financial District is selling for about $750,000.
Source: Forbes, Matt Woolsey (11/13/200. Full story below or link to full story: http://www.forbes.com/2007/11/13/undervalued-markets-housing-forbeslife-cx_mw_1113value.html
Is now a good time to buy?
Last year, the home sale market began to slow, causing many
buyers to postpone buying hoping that prices would drop. In
fact, in some areas and in some segments of the market, prices
have declined. However, in high-demand markets like San
Francisco, Austin and Seattle, prices increased compared to a
year ago, particularly for upper-end properties.
When interest rates fell below 6.5 percent at the beginning of
2007, San Francisco Bay Area buyers were back competing against one another
in a low-inventory market. Was it wise for these buyers to postpone buying until
2007? Waiting resulted in lower interest rates, but in many cases, a higher
purchase price.
Mass psychology influences home-buying patterns. For example, when buyers
decide that it is not a good time to buy due to fear of falling prices or rising
interest rates, this notion tends to become a self-fulfilling prophesy. When the
volumes of home sales drop, buyers tend to hold back. When sales heat up,
buyers perceive this as a good sign. They feel they must buy immediately before
home prices rise and they are priced out of the market.
Buyers tend to follow the herd, which is counterintuitive. It would seem that the
best time to buy would be when there isn't competition from other buyers -- that
it, in a slow market. However, most buyers feel more comfortable buying when
all their friends are buying. The comfort of the crowd validates that their
decision is a good one.
Home sale markets are cyclical. There are up markets, down markets, and stable
or balanced markets. In an ideal world, you would buy at the end of a down
cycle, just before the housing market picks up again. But, it's impossible to time
the real estate market. You know that the bottom of a cycle has passed only
when the market is moving upwards again.
HOUSE HUNTING TIP: Given the cyclical nature of housing markets, home
buying is risky unless you have a long-term perspective in mind. If you buy at
the peak of a cycle and are forced to sell soon after in a softer market, you could
end up selling for less than the price you paid. Buyers who can stay put and ride
out a down cycle are in a better position to recoup their investment when they
sell, and possibly make a profit.
In an uncertain market, buyers who are not sure about how long they will be
living in an area may be better off renting than buying. It's often difficult to find
a rental that feels like home. However, from a purely financial point of view,
buying for the short term could end up costing more than you anticipated if you
need to sell in a down market.
A common complaint about renting is that it's a waste of money. There are no
tax benefits and you don't build equity. However, it can cost less to rent than to
buy. To get the tax write-off, you often need to pay more than you'd have to pay
renting. Renting usually requires no home maintenance and there's no risk of
losing equity.
Good candidates for buying in a slower market are buyers who are ready to put
down roots and stay put for awhile. This not only means that you aren't planning
on moving out of the area soon, but it also means that you can afford to buy a
home that will suit your long-term needs.
THE CLOSING: A purchase decision should involve a consideration of the
dynamics at play in your local market. Prices might or might not drop in your
area. In many places, sales volume is off, but not prices. When inventories are
reduced and buyers are back in droves, prices could go up.
Dian Hymer is author of "House Hunting, The Take-Along Workbook for Home
Buyers" and "Starting Out, The Complete Home Buyer's Guide," Chronicle
Books.
***
What's your opinion? Send your Letter to the Editor to opinion@inman.com.
Copyright 2007 Dian Hymer


No comments yet |